an 'i should' thought or statement is more likely to attract another 'i should' thought than a soul-ution. whereas total detachment from any type of 'i should' variation leads to ease and thus a soul-ution is brought about quicker.
'i should heal myself.'
attracts 'i should take an aromatherapy bath'
whereas 'i feel well'
attracts ' i feel heart-centered'
in the first example, our word order agrees upon us coming from a place of disease, resistance to ease. whereas in the second example, we centre our thought from a viewpoint of ease, thus it is easier to agree with healing. in the first example, we think we need to ACT in order to feel healing or well-being but in the second it is already so from a perspective of BEING. the second example is more likely to remind us of a greater healing cycle already happening in and around us, among which examples are the rivers flowing, children laughing, mountains in cold and breezy temperatures, trees vibrating in harmony with all-that-is, animals in the eternal present, streams of crystal clear water, pristine lakes; cranes, geese, and ducks in their usual natural habitats; elephants crossing patches of water; horses massaging the earth with their gallops; earthquakes clearing large pathways in the earth's core, and people showing up on time.
'i should' thoughts get magnetized on the 'i should band' of thoughts; better to stay detached.
